The ordination record of 1692 is puzzling. It identifies TP as of St Mary Hall, in which case this is the same person as CCE ID81468. BUT, there is already an ordination record of 1693 linked to that record and, according to Foster, that person did not receive his BA until 1693 (cf the ordination record linked here, which indicates 81469 as BA in 1692). There is no other Thomas Pugh of St Mary Hall. It is possible that this person might be:
Foster: Pugh, Thomas, s. Hug., of Tugford, Salop, cler. All Souls' Coll., matric. 5 May 1688, aged 17; BA 6 Feb 1691-2. But there is no indication that this person was at St Mary Hall.
Year | Type | Name as Recorded | Location | Office/Status | Full Record |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1692 | Ordi(ordination) | Pugh, Thomas | / | deacon | View |